October 6, 2011
It was hard to ignore the rumblings of a political upheaval. Another election for mayor was coming up in Vermont’s largest city, a multi-million dollar Burlington Telecom lawsuit accused the administration of fraud and breach of contract, and the mayor faced widespread criticism – often from within his own Progressive Party base. The atmosphere was as volatile as it had been in three decades.
Bob Kiss and Kurt Wright |
Four candidates to replace Mayor Bob Kiss had announced by
early October, and at least three more were considering it. The official list included
three Democrats – Airport Commissioner Miro Weinberger, State Representative
Jason Lorber and City Councilor Bram Kranichfeld -- and one Republican, Kurt Wright,
a council member and state lawmaker who had come close to beating Kiss three
years earlier.
All of them were hammering Kiss about BT finances and
other examples of what they considered the administration’s mismanagement,
deceit and failure to communicate.
One of the possible contenders was State Senator Tim Ashe, a
former City Council Progressive and now perhaps the party’s best hope for an
alliance with Democrats. There was also Assistant Housing Director Brian Pine,
another former member of the council, and Ward 3 Progressive Councilor
Emma Mulvaney-Stanak.
Mayor Kiss was mum about his plans, even at Party meetings.
But the push for someone to challenge him, along with an upsurge in local activism
on issues like his attempt to forge a climate change partnership with Lockheed
Martin, pointed to a tumultuous winter political season. No matter what the
weather, the upcoming debates were sure to be heated, tense and well-attended.
Questions were also being raised about the election process
itself, specifically about whether people should continue running with party
labels. In September the City Council had narrowly rejected a resolution to
look at changing the city charter to eliminate party designations for mayoral
and City Council contests, but only after a debate so intense that Board
President Bill Keogh had to angrily hammer his gavel and call a halt.
The discussion highlighted the unique nature of Burlington’s
political landscape, three political parties
uneasily sharing legislative power, and an executive branch run by Progressives
for all but two of the last 30 years. It had all begun in March 1981 when Bernie
Sanders unseated long-term incumbent Democrat Gordon Paquette by just 10 votes.
Three decades later, despite agreeing with Progressives on many
issues, local Democrats saw a strong chance of recapturing the city’s most
powerful job for the first time in decades. The reasons for their optimism: Burlington’s
finances were in trouble and the mayor was unpopular, widely considered neither
accountable nor transparent enough. On September 16, that view received a boost
when Moody’s Investors Service warned that the city’s financial woes could lead
to a further downgrade in its credit rating.
At Miro Weinberger’s campaign announcement on September 13,
held next door to City Hall in a former firehouse managed by Burlington City
Arts, the first-time candidate charged that Mayor Kiss had put the city in “an
exceptionally poor negotiating position.” An apparent reluctance to discuss the
details of Burlington Telecom finances had “left a mood of anger and anxiety
about our future,” he charged. The 41-year-old housing developer also criticized
the administration’s failure to secure funding before starting on a $14 million
airport parking lot expansion.
Jason Lorber was first |
Jason Lorber, the first candidate to enter the race, had a
similar critique. Weighing in on the Telecom lawsuit, the state legislator and
gay rights activist, who made a living as a consultant and standup comedian,
said BT’s woes were a prime example of the need for change. Although promising
not to assign blame, he nevertheless accused the mayor of failing to be
sufficiently open about city affairs. Local residents “don’t want decisions
being made behind closed doors,” he charged.
On his campaign website, Bram Kranichfeld, a criminal
prosecutor at the Chittenden County State’s Attorney’s Office, defined himself
as “the people’s choice” and said he wanted to “restore trust, accountability
and fiscal responsibility.” At 31, he was the youngest candidate, and counted
among his backers a former Democratic mayoral candidate, Paul Lafayette.
Although Kranichfeld had opposed the move to drop party designations, he
frequently talked about a “non-partisan approach.”
Kurt Wright had made his official announcement on September
18 during appearances on a morning TV news program and local radio talk. Also promising
to restore trust and credibility, he said, “Job No. 1 for me will be to restore
fiscal responsibility to the city and restore our credit rating.” As a
Republican who had run twice before, he knew that the less people thought about
party allegiances the better chance he had with what had become over the years
a decidedly liberal electorate.
Politics
by the numbers
When Mayor Peter Clavelle decided to retire in late 2005
after 15 years in office, he and his allies didn’t believe that another
Progressive could be elected, or that the local party would long survive. As a
result, a number of local progressive figures decided to endorse Hinda Miller, a Democratic
state legislator and entrepreneur running to succeed him.
The leaders of Burlington’s Progressive Party weren’t willing
to accept that prognosis, however, and turned to Kiss, a veteran human services
bureaucrat and state legislator. He ended up beating Miller by about 9 percent
and became the first Burlington mayor elected using instant runoff voting.
Rumors circulated that some GOP supporters were urged privately to give Kiss
their second place vote rather than indirectly help the Democrat. In any case,
the conclusion that the city’s progressive era was over proved to be premature.
In office Kiss continued along a pragmatic, sometimes
progressive path – lean budgets, “modest growth” and innovations like
BT, a municipal cable, phone and Internet service operation. Business Week
called Burlington one of the best places “to raise your kids,” and the Centers
for Disease Control crowned it the nation’s “healthiest city.”
In the 2009 race, despite various political affiliations, five
mayoral candidates embraced a similar mixture of liberal rhetoric and practical
proposals that first emerged during the Sanders era. Wright talked about
leadership and Democrat Andy Montroll argued that Burlington was “coasting along.”
Neither questioned how the city was being run.
During one debate, Montroll said that the best course was to
focus on “what we have,” while Independent challenger Dan Smith stressed the
need to “reinvent ourselves” in a “post-partisan” era. The only substantive
criticism of Kiss revolved around his handling of accounting and personnel
matters.
In the end, 8,980 people voted – about 1,000 less than had
three years earlier – and Kiss was re-elected. In the initial IRV count,
however, Wright received 2,951 votes, beating Kiss by almost 400. In the second
round of the runoff, the votes of independent Dan Smith and Green Party
candidate James Simpson were redistributed to the remaining three. Wright was
still ahead, with 3,294 votes to 2,981 for Kiss.
But when Montroll’s votes were redistributed for a third
round, Kiss pulled ahead with 4,313, beating Wright’s 4,061. The Republican’s
supporters were not pleased and mounted a campaign to repeal IRV, which they
succeeded in doing by 52 to 48 percent the following year.
In 2012, the race would be decided the old way, the top
vote-getter over 40 percent. The question was whether Kiss would even seek a
third term. He was no longer popular or even trusted with many locals, and
seemed tired of the games. But even if he opted out, the Progressive Party
faced an uphill battle with almost any candidate. That’s why politicians like
Ashe, with ties to both Progressives and Democrats, were being recruited, and
why Pine talked about reaching out beyond the base.
Burlington’s “third party” had evolved from an informal
coalition after Sanders became mayor into part of a statewide electoral organization.
At its height, it had almost half the seats on the City Council. But in 2011
there were only two Progressives, both representing Ward 3, heart of the city
and once a Democratic stronghold.
Kiss was beleaguered from both the right and left by criticisms about openness, finances and BT, a major progressive initiative at risk of being sold or sparking a major financial crisis. Thirty years after Sanders first local victory Democrats dominated the Council, and along with Republicans, envisioned a return to executive power.
As Bernie put it back in 1981, it was time for a change –
real change.
NEXT: When Lockheed Came to Town
No comments:
Post a Comment